Randy Blazak is a PhD from Emory University with a specialty in hate crimes.Specifically he studied racist skinheads (he doesn't say just "skin heads" because you can shave your head without being a racist).He's a professor of sociology at PSU where his intro class is opening people's minds, and a professor of criminology at OU.
His talk for the Freedom From Religion Foundation on 1/15/18 was entitled "With Odin on Our Side; The Role of Religion in Right Wing Extremism."I didn't understand why he said Odin in the title until the end of the talk, but it has to do with the fact that an ancient Viking religion is being propagated in our prisons as a cover for white supremacist gangs.I'm going to take the information from his talk and put it in chronological order, and flesh it out with links to articles around the web, trying to make sense of the times.
At the end of his talk Blazak summarized that there are two profiles for violent haters; sociopaths, and lower level thinkers.Sociopaths, or more specifically people with antisocial personality disorder, have no qualms about injuring or killing others because they have no conscience.These are the people we need to imprison long-term.Lower level thinkers are simply regular folks who joined the cause because they were alone and needed to belong.They weren’t philosophical about it, they were simply vulnerable.These are the people that we need to help.
It's been decades since I read Siddhartha but it had a strong effect on me. In my youth I was a philosophy major and a seeker, trying on different religious and spiritual approaches. Eventually I arrived at myself, at the now, at the goals of non-attachment, awareness, compassion, adaptability. I adopted bits and pieces of many philosophies, most notably Buddhism and Hinduism, without becoming a believer in reincarnation, heaven and hell, or any of the other dogmas. New age religion in the US is very much a groovified hand-me-down from the culture behind these religions, and reincarnation is the most common belief system I encounter among people who pretend that they are enlightened. More appealing to me is the stark realism of the German philosophers. "To exist is to be in the way".
In Demian Herman Hesse suggests that the truth is not any of these religious structures, the truth is something far simpler, but harder to live. It is not easy to go through this world stripped of comforting beliefs. Hesse says we create gods and then we fight with them. Many of his ideas are reminiscent of Nieztsche, for whom I've always had a soft spot. He is the German philosopher who said "God is dead" and pissed off generations of religious people.
The protagonist of Demian is a young man named Sinclair, and his story begins when he is only 10 years old. He is early at becoming aware. Demian is a character who helps him, initially simply to avoid a predatorial character, and later to begin to think critically and to trust in himself. When they are schoolmates Demian suggests alternate interpretations of Bible stories, especially the one about Cain and Able, and the mark of Cain. By the end of the book I was thinking that I too must bear that mark, because I have never been a joiner, never been willing or able to submit to authority or dogma.
This book would make excellent reading for a teen who is beginning to sort out a path through all the competing authorities. It does not provide a blueprint, but it does say that you must find your own path, and that it won't be easy or comfortable. When Hesse first released this small book in 1919 it was in pieces in a magazine, and anonymously. Why didn't he want his name attached? Why didn't someone recognize his voice and thoughts, when they are so distinctly his? Perhaps it is because Demian is also a commentary on the sadness of war, on the fruitlessness of giving lives for some shared ideal which might be bunk. Some of the things he writes harken to the Jungian concept of collective consciousness, for example the shared premonitions of the onset of world war one. Do we really share a consciousness, or do we simply share some of the same inputs, and arrive at some of the same intuitive conclusions? Jung and Hesse did.
The most fruitful thing a person can do is to become themselves, I agree with Hesse on this point. To be with people who are also themselves, this is a very satisfying thing.
I’ve written about restoring the ancient traditions of Saturnalia to this blessed time of year (Io, Saturnalia!), but some people just have no sense of tradition. They just want me to put the Christ back in Christmas. Fine, I don’t want to cause offense by wishing anyone “Happy Holidays” when all they want is for me to validate their personal piety. So let’s get Christ into our celebrations.
Just who is this Christ anyway? Christians say he’s a person named Jesus, and we can learn all about him in the Gospels. Sure enough, in the first chapter of the Gospel attributed to Matthew, we find a lengthy (17 verses!) section of begats tracing Jesus’ lineage back to the ur-patriarch, Abraham. In the third chapter of Luke’s Gospel, we find fifteen verses of a reverse genealogy tracing Jesus back to Adam, and ultimately, God.
I felt some loneliness the first week I was here. But now, no. I have enough acquaintances to not feel lonely. The landlady, Marie, speaks English and her bf is American. And her niece, Emma, also…
Comments