?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The *mummys didn't have cancer* argument is only part of it. Scroll down to the comments to see his breakdown of how we give ourselves cancer.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/12/03/cancer-not-found-in-ancient-mummies-appears-to-be-recent-disease.aspx

Comments

( 3 comments — Leave a comment )
bodylove
Dec. 9th, 2010 08:00 pm (UTC)
that article doesn't make sense...the human life expectancy averaged around 30 yrs for ages...it's only recently that people are living long enough to develop different types of cancers...
liveonearth
Dec. 9th, 2010 08:44 pm (UTC)
Yes...the mummy argument is weak, I agree. He jumps from his attention-getting point to his anti-cancer protocols which are backed by science. If all that science is taken in, the conclusion that we set the scene for cancer development is difficult to avoid. But it's still not "proven".
bodylove
Dec. 9th, 2010 09:11 pm (UTC)
yeah the part about good nutrition and vitamin D etc is useful....but the mummy thing made me not want to read more!
( 3 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

moon
liveonearth
liveonearth

Latest Month

April 2019
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Tags

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by chasethestars