from http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/07/15/do-you-think-the-fda-will-approve-of-this.aspx?source=nl where there are links galore
Here are Mercola's comments:
Well, l’ll let the cat out of the bag right here and tell you that I am not actually running for President.
This was a light-hearted parody; an idea spawned by the unlikely success of Ron Paul’s grass-roots’ campaign.
It’s disappointing that he didn’t make it all the way to become the Republican candidate for the U.S. Presidency, but despite being completely IGNORED by mainstream media, Ron Paul STILL made it to the final round!
He definitely had my vote and support because more so than any other presidential candidate, Ron Paul has continuously pushed to improve the fatally flawed health paradigm.
Aside from his dedication to principle, good old fashioned American freedom, and the American constitution – areas that have been trampled upon and abused more and more in the past several years – Congressman Ron Paul has always been devoted to your health freedom, championing issues such as:
Expanding the ability of Americans to use alternative medicine and new treatments.
Opposing legislation that increases the FDA‘s legal powers.
The notion that the government should never have the power to require immunizations or vaccinations.
These are issues that must be faced, with or without Ron Paul in office, and I will continue doing my part to educate and provide you with the vital information you need to optimize your health.
I won’t be doing it from the Oval Office, but my website, and this newsletter, is my way of helping incite the changes necessary. You too can help by sharing the information with your friends and loved ones.
MORE comments from Mercola 5/18/07, after Ron Paul introduced the Health Freedom Protection Act to prevent the FDA from exercising undue control over foods and supplements routinely used by natural healthcare providers...... from http://v.mercola.com/blogs/public_blog/Ron-Paul-Introduces-Legislation-to-Limit-the-FDA-s-Authority-Over-Supplements-16520.aspx
and based on an article on Lew Rockwell called "The FDA has Blood on its hands"....
Ron Paul Introduces Legislation to Limit the FDA's Authority Over Supplements
Not only has U.S. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) been making quite an impression during the recent Republican presidential debates, he's introduced a bill that would curb restrictions imposed by the FDA and FTC regarding health claims for dietary supplements.
The Health Freedom Protection Act would prevent the FDA from censoring truthful claims about the curative or preventative effect of dietary supplements, a popular issue for Americans but not necessarily Congressmen, especially for those receiving donations from the mega-drug company cartel.
According to this interesting Lew Rockwell report, one of the more recent flashpoints in the debate over dietary supplements occurred eight years ago after studies emerged that tart cherries may do more good than aspirin or other anti-inflammatory drugs when it comes to pain relief.
When cherry growers began to cite this research, the FDA came down hard on 29 of them, threatening legal action if they didn't remove the scientific evidence about cherries from their Web sites. At the very same time the FDA was harassing cherry farmers, the agency was approving the heart-stopping drug, Vioxx that was pulled from the American market in 2004.
I can only hope Dr. Paul's pending legislation will gain traction in Congress, despite the efforts of legislators and some heavy-handed agencies to protect the interests of big business at the expense of your health. In the meantime, there are plenty of safer, healthier alternatives to treat your pain without the need for a heart-stopping drug.
TEXT from the Bill Sardi's article on Lew Rockwell:
Congressman Ron Paul (Texas), running for President these days, is more than an anti-war candidate; he has launched his campaign with the introduction of legislation in the House of Representatives that is likely to gain him plenty of recognition and unarguable public support. Congressman Paul, not a government expansionist by any measure, has introduced legislation that would rein in the Food and Drug Administration’s absurd restrictions regarding health claims for dietary supplements.
Lest we forget, passage of the Dietary Supplement Health & Education Act in 1994, which staved off efforts by the FDA to designate dietary supplements as drugs, was buoyed by more letters to Congress than for any other prior issue facing the nation. Americans don’t like government snooping into bedrooms, messing with their guns, and certainly not restricting their access to vitamin pills.
For years, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have continued to censor and engage in heavy-handed attempts to restrict access to supplements and educational information for Americans, even when courts have ruled the public has a right to information about dietary supplements and should judge the merits of health claims for supplements for themselves rather than having the FDA make such decisions.
The Health Freedom Protection Act
The bill, H.R. 2117, the Health Freedom Protection Act, would stop the FDA from censoring truthful claims about the curative, mitigative, or preventative effects of dietary supplements, says Scott Tips of the National Health Federation, a Monrovia, California-based organization that is leading the charge behind this legislation.
In regards to this issue, it’s easy to see why Congressman Paul has said enough is enough, and puzzling why other Congressman haven’t lifted a word in protest to the FDA. A primary example of FDAs absurd policies can be seen in the recent debacle between cherry growers and the agency.
FDA picks on cherry growers
It began in 1999 when a peer-reviewed report in the Journal of Natural Products, published by the American Chemical Society, the world’s largest scientific society, concluded that tart cherries may relieve pain better than aspirin and many other anti-inflammatory drugs. It turns out that consumption of about 20 cherries reduces inflammation in a similar manner as aspirin or Cox-2 inhibiting drugs without the lethal side effects of gastric bleeding or vitamin depletion associated with these drugs. The molecules in cherries, called anthocyanins, work to reduce inflammation at ten times less dosage than aspirin. [Journal Natural Products 1999 Feb; 62(2): 294–6] Pills that provide concentrated anthocyanins would make it even easier to consumers to achieve these health benefits.
When cherry growers began to cite this scientific study, the FDA followed by sending a warning letter to 29 companies that market cherries, threatening regulatory action if they did not remove the scientific information regarding the anti-inflammatory properties of cherries from their websites. The FDA declared cherries to be "drugs" once health claims for a disease were associated with the product.
Bob Underwood, who sells capsules containing concentrated cherry paste, was quoted in an Associated Press story in 2006 as saying: "We have the government telling people to eat more fruits and vegetables, and we have the U.S. Department of Agriculture funding some of these fruit studies, and now we have another arm of the federal government that says you can't use the research." But the problem is much worse than government censorship. A more foreboding problem lay ahead.
Lives could have been saved
While the FDA was threatening cherry growers, it was giving approval to a drug maker for a new type of COX-2 inhibiting anti-inflammatory drug that claimed it was safer than ibuprofen or aspirin. The FDA also permitted this new prescription-only anti-inflammatory drug to be advertised on television, even though long-term safety data was not available. As it turns out, this drug wasn’t any safer than aspirin and the FDA took no subsequent action against the drug maker that submitted misleading preliminary safety data in its application for FDA approval. This anti-inflammatory drug went on to cause thousands of side effects and was associated with the deaths of an estimated 20,000 Americans, mostly due to mortal heart attacks. An FDA "whistleblower," Dr. David Graham, had to alert the public to this problem.
If only the public knew about the anti-inflammatory properties of cherries, thousands of Americans would have not met their early and avoidable demise. The FDA has blood on its hands regarding this issue. It should have elected for cherry stains instead.
The FDA doesn’t disagree with the scientific information about cherries, but it does say that cherries have not been recognized as safe and effective when used as labeled. Do we need a double-blind placebo-controlled study to prove cherries promote health?
Jeffrey May, editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter (the "publication of record" in the antitrust and trade regulation fields), quotes Rep. Ron Paul as saying there is a need to stop "federal bureaucrats from preventing Americans from learning about simple ways to improve their health."
Burden of proof on government
The proposed Health Freedom Protection Act would place the burden of proof on the FTC to establish that an advertisement for a dietary supplement or a dietary ingredient is "false and misleading and that the advertisement actually causes consumers to be misled into believing to be true that which is demonstrably false."
The FTC has required "supplement manufacturers to satisfy an unobtainable standard of proof that their statement is true," according to Rep. Paul. The bill also requires that the FTC warn parties that their advertising is false and give them a chance to correct their mistakes.
National Health Federation contact information: P.O. Box 688, Monrovia, CA 91017 USA; 1 (626) 357-2181; Fax 1 (626) 303-0642; Website; E-mail.